Filed under: religion

Jeffs Restored As Head Of FLDS

He may be sitting in a Texas prison, but Warren Jeffs has officially resumed control of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS), the nation's largest polygamist group.

A document filed with the Utah Department of Commerce names Jeffs as president and "corporation sole" of the FLDS faith. "Corporation sole" is a phrase often used to give corporate authority to an individual leader of a religious group. The document is at the bottom of this post.

In a letter that accompanies the document, Jeffs says that he was "called and sustained as the President" of the FLDS Church. The faithful believe that their "president and prophet" is "called" to the position in a process that is divinely inspired. Other leaders and members then "sustain" that calling.

Jeffs had officially surrendered control of the faith in 2007 after being convicted of being an accomplice to rape and sentenced to two consecutive terms of five years to life in prison.

Earlier that year, according to court documents and jail recordings in Utah, Jeffs abdicated his position as FLDS prophet, admitted to "immoral" behavior with a sister and daughter and said God "had revealed to him that he was a wicked man."


These statements were made during a period of poor physical and mental health in prison, which included a suicide attempt, according to court documents filed by Jeffs' attorneys. Jeffs later renounced the statements.

Jeffs' Utah conviction was overturned last year by the Utah Supreme Court. A similar prosecution in Arizona was dismissed. Jeffs was then extradited to Texas to face charges of bigamy and sexual abuse of a child.

It is unclear why Jeffs would resume control of his church now, or how he would lead the faith while in prison. Attorney Rodney Parker, who has represented the FLDS in the past,says that he is "not in a position to comment."

Jeffs faces new allegations that he imported three child brides from an FLDS community in Canada and married them in the United States. A hearing in Vancouver Friday in the British Columbia Supreme Court will determine whether evidence of those allegations will become part of a court case focused on the constitutionality of polygamy in Canada.

flds_delcaration

Vatican court kept Irish child rapist as a priest

 

The Vatican tried to stop Dublin church leaders from defrocking a particularly dangerous pedophile priest and relented only after he raped a boy in a pub restroom, an investigation reported Friday.

Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin said he fully accepted the findings of the latest chapter in Ireland's investigation into child abuse by Dublin priests who were shielded from the law by Catholic leaders.

Martin called Tony Walsh an "extremely devious man" who should never have been ordained a priest, and said the report highlighted how the church had grown too powerful and arrogant in 20th century Ireland.

A state-ordered investigation into Dublin Archdiocese cover-ups reported last year that Catholic officials had shielded scores of priests from criminal investigation over several decades and didn't report any crimes to the police until the mid-1990s. The findings sent shock waves through the church and forced three Irish bishops to resign, although the Vatican refused to accept the resignations of Martin's two junior bishops.

A chapter dealing with Walsh was censored from the original report because he was still facing a criminal trial. The Department of Justice published the chapter Friday following the 56-year-old Walsh's Dec. 6 conviction for raping three boys over a five-year period three decades ago. He received a 12-year prison sentence.

The investigators — a judge and lawyers acting independently of the Irish government — concluded that Walsh actually raped and molested hundreds of boys and girls while serving as a Dublin priest from 1978 to 1996, a reign of terror that church leaders never effectively stopped.

They described Walsh as "probably the most notorious child sexual abuser" of the 46 cases they investigated covering the years 1975-2004. Walsh often performed as an Elvis impersonator in a traveling Catholic song-and-dance production popular with children called the "All Priests Show." The report found this increased his easy access to victims, as did his interest in scouting groups and taking altar boys on visits to the Dublin seminary, Clonliffe College.

The fact-finders based their conclusions on previously confidential Dublin and Vatican documents and interviews with key church figures that took five years to gather. They found that Dublin Archdiocese leaders spent several years arguing over whether Walsh should be defrocked, sent to counselors in England, or assigned to duties that kept him away from children.

Martin, a veteran Vatican diplomat appointed to clean up the Dublin scandals in 2004, handed over the archdiocese's previously secret abuse files to the investigation. His predecessor, Cardinal Desmond Connell, had refused.

Martin said the church concealed child abuse easily for so long because its power in 20th century Ireland "had grown beyond what is legitimate. It acted as a world apart. It had often become self-centered and arrogant. It felt that it could be forgiving of abusers in a simplistic manner and rarely empathized with the hurt of children."

He noted that, just two days into Walsh's first parish assignment in Dublin's impoverished Ballyfermot district in 1978, the priest was accused of molesting a boy.

"He probably should never have been appointed at that stage without investigating the matter," Martin said.

Instead the report found that the church made only patchy, ill-coordinated efforts to look into a string of abuse complaints against Walsh until 1986, when he was transferred to another Dublin parish "to avoid further scandal in Ballyfermot."

There, the parochial house's maid reported finding copious evidence that Walsh was abusing boys in his room and using her own stolen clothing. A senior legal official from the church interviewed Walsh several times about his pedophilia.

"He denied nothing," the Dublin Archdiocese's chancellor and canon lawyer, Monsignor Alex Stenson, wrote after one 1985 interview. He advised Walsh to see a psychiatrist.

The report found that the Dublin Archdiocese should have reported Walsh to police by 1979 when evidence of his pedophilia was already evident. But it also faulted police for repeatedly deferring to church authority.

Detectives in 1990 and 1992 received reports that Walsh was molesting children — once when he was spotted trying to coax a boy into his car — but dropped interest after being told that church officials were handling the problem internally.

The report found that then-Archbishop Connell fought his own legal advisers to convene a 1993 canonical trial of Walsh that ended in his temporary defrocking.

But Walsh appealed to the church's appellate court, the Rome Rota, and won a reprieve. The Rota judges reinstated him as a priest and ordered Irish officials to reassign him to a monastery for 10 years.

In May 1994, Walsh sexually assaulted a boy in a pub restroom following the funeral of the boy's grandfather. Months later, a Dublin mother accused Walsh of driving her son to the brink of suicide after abusing him while "baby-sitting" one night.

Police finally opened an investigation in earnest. Church documents showed that Stenson ordered Walsh to stay away from children and no longer wear the priest's uniform — or risk having his pay reduced.

Walsh was convicted of attacking the boy in the pub restroom in February 1995 and received a 12-month sentence. He was later convicted of sexually assaulting several more boys and received a further 10-year sentence that was reduced in a 1997 appeal to six years.

During these criminal trials Connell wrote first to the Rome Rota explaining he could not find a monastery willing to house Walsh and could not reassign him to a parish overseas — a longtime church practice for managing pedophile priests — because he had been charged with crimes.

Finally he appealed in a letter seeking the personal intercession of Pope John Paul II to defrock Walsh. "The archbishop humbly begs the Holy Father graciously to grant him this favor in the interests of the well-being of the church," he wrote.

The report documented how the future pope, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, replied in January 1996 confirming that John Paul had expelled Walsh from the priesthood.

But after Walsh was paroled from prison in 2002, the report said, he continued to travel around Ireland masquerading as a priest and winning the confidence of children, more than 20 of whom reported sexual assaults.

He faced fresh charges when three more of his victims from Ballyfermot in the late 1970s and 1980s came forward. Last week he received prison sentences that total 123 years — the greatest ever imposed on a pedophile priest in Ireland — but the system will recognize only the first 12 years.

"I sleep better now that he is in prison rather than wandering the streets of Dublin," Martin said.

Megachurches still in the money despite hard times

Collections at small and mid-size Protestant churches are getting clobbered by the recession, but megachurches? Not so much.

Bob Smietana at the Nashville Tennessean reported the story yesterday for us that one in three Protestant pastors say that giving is down, with giving overall down 3 percent.

However, he found that while small churches are pinched...

...giving and attendance are up at the nation's largest congregations, according to the Leadership Network, an association for megachurches.

The group surveyed 253 churches that average over 1,000 in weekly attendance. About 8 in ten said attendance was up at their services. Two thirds said the giving was up around 3 percent.

"All in all, most North American megachurches have remained vigilant but healthy through the recession," the report claims.

That's wasn't so last Christmas at Rev. Rick Warren's massive Saddleback Community Church in Lake Forest, California.

The megapastor, author of the global best-selling The Purpose Driven Life, who gave the invocation at President Obama's inauguration, sent out an urgent letter asking members to make up a $900,000 budget shortfall to fund services and ministries. His pitch caught national attention and $2.5 million flooded in.

This Christmas season, Saddleback is "doing just fine," and about to launch a multi-million-dollar capitol campaign, Kristin Cole, a spokeswoman for the church's public relations firm, told Smietana.

Not that Saddleback is skimping on ministry and services. We just carried a story about the church funding a unique Thanksgiving program. It was designed to bolster anti-gang efforts by working with at-risk middle-schoolers to present their families with the fixings for a festive meal.

Still, Leadership Network didn't measure the other impacts of the recession such as frozen wages or layoffs for church staff and declines in volunteerism as church members are working harder and longer Monday through Friday. Megachuches could still feel a bite on those fronts.

Neither does the original LifeWay research survey on offerings and the Leadership Network survey explore whether there's a difference in the economic security of people who belong to largely suburban megachurches. The demographic profile of small church members could reveal that they are not less generous in spirit than megachurch-goers, just less able financially.

Are Sunday mornings economically segregated? Has the rough economy cut into your ability to give money or time to your place of worship?

U.N. Takes Stand Against Freedom of Speech, Religion

Freedom House is disappointed that the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly yesterday voted in favor of a resolution, “Combating defamation of religions,” which has dangerous implications for freedom of expression and other human rights.

The non-binding resolution is a cosmetically modified version of similar resolutions that have long been condemned by human rights groups and yet have continued to pass at both the UN Human Rights Council and General Assembly.  Ostensibly intended to promote “social harmony” and religious tolerance, the resolutions call on governments to ban speech considered offensive to some religious believers. Though continuing to pass, the resolution has gradually begun to lose support. This year, the resolution passed by a vote of 76 to 64 with 42 abstentions, compared to last year’s Third Committee vote of 81 to 55 with 43 abstentions.

“We are disappointed that this pernicious resolution has passed yet again, despite strong evidence that legal measures to restrict speech are both ineffective and a direct violation of freedom of expression,” said Paula Schriefer, director of advocacy at Freedom House.  “We nonetheless appreciate the declining support for such resolutions and hope that more states will vote against the resolution at the full General Assembly.”

Freedom House recently released a report that details the implications of domestic laws against religious “defamation,” which are frequently used to repress religious minorities, restrict the ability of Muslims to practice their faith the way they choose, and to settle personal grudges. The full General Assembly is expected to vote on the resolution in December.

Freedom House is an independent watchdog organization that supports democratic change, monitors the status of freedom around the world, and advocates for democracy and human rights. 

What the Pope Really Said About Condoms

The headline around the world was that the Pope was finally allowing the use of condoms in certain circumstances. The news came after an Italian newspaper broke an embargo on a book-length interview with Benedict XVI by the German journalist Peter Seewald, perhaps the only popular interlocutor whom the Pontiff, in his previous role as a Cardinal, has cooperated with on such a scale.

Benedict's so-called condom concession was not a huge one. He still proscribes the use of condoms as contraception (as he does the birth control pill). His specific example, that of a male prostitute choosing to use a condom in a conscious choice to prevent HIV infection, is couched as "a first step in the direction of moralization, a first assumption of responsibility, on the way toward recovering an awareness that not everything is allowed and that one cannot do whatever one wants." Benedict seems to imply a scale of good and bad intentions — from the indiscriminate use of condoms and other contraceptives to the idea of preventing the spread of AIDS to following the teachings of the Catholic Church. Condoms are not the ultimate solution or the prescribed Catholic way, he reiterates, though Benedict allows that there is little the church can do to prevent anyone from acquiring condoms. Still, he insists that "the sheer fixation on the condom implies a banalization of sexuality... the dangerous source of the attitude of no longer seeing sexuality as the expression of love."

Benedict's statement about condoms is part of Light of the World: The Pope, the Church, and the Sign of the Times, Seewald's far-ranging six-hour interview to be published by Ignatius Press. The Pope supplies often frank and personal responses. Indeed, Benedict admits that he was "provoked" by a reporter's question during a 2009 press conference that called the Catholic Church's approach to AIDS "unrealistic and ineffective." He responded to the question by defending the enormous amount of work done by religious organizations worldwide in treating "AIDS victims, especially children with AIDS." "The Church does more than anyone else," he told Seewald. "And I stand by that claim."

Seewald and the Pope discuss numerous subjects, from the church child abuse scandal to homosexuality to papal retirements to the Book of Revelation. For the most part, Benedict is surprisingly open though unsurprisingly wedded to orthodoxy, even as he defends it spiritedly. At times, he is almost relativistic, preferring to read the Bible in symbolic ways rather than with a hard-edged literalism. For example, while he says that Christians must always look forward to the coming of Christ, it must be in a continuously spiritual way; and that a believer must not look for that return "in a chronological sense," which "would be false." Indeed, the Pope argues against a literal interpretation of the biblical book so often used by doomsayers to herald the end of the world. "The important thing is that every period open itself to the presence of the Lord."

And yet, he can cite the Bible and tradition in iron-clad ways, for example, in the case of women priests. Benedict reiterates his predecessor John Paul II's position: "The Church has 'no authority' to ordain women. The point is not that we are saying that we don't want to, but that we can't" — that is, because there is no biblical or historical basis for it. Even though he says that "Jesus brought women into a closer relationship with him than had been thinkable before his time," he says that women can shape the Church in more powerful ways than men without having to be priests.

In the interview, the Pope defended priestly celibacy which he describes as "an affront to what man normally thinks" and thus an ideal approach the kingdom of heaven. And while he does not deny that gay men and women have civil rights, he says that "homosexuality is incompatible with the priestly vocation. Otherwise, celibacy would lose its meaning as a renunciation." (Homosexuality, he repeats, "remains contrary to the essence of what God originally willed.")

He admits that the abuse scandal is a terrible crisis. "As a result the faith as such becomes unbelievable, and the Church can no longer present herself credibly as the herald of the Lord," he said. He discusses at some length the scandal in Ireland and how, "it was a surprise [to him] that abuse also existed on that scale" in his native Germany.

That admission, however, brings up an unanswered and perhaps unasked question about an incident that occurred during the Pope's brief administration of the the Church in the German city of Munich when he was Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger. In 1980, Ratzinger had personally authorized the transfer of an abusive priest, Peter Hullermann, from another part of Germany to his own archdiocese, ostensibly for therapy. But just days after his arrival, the priest was allowed to serve among the flock. Hullermann was convicted of subsequent sexual assaults in 1986. The Vatican insists that, like other Archbishops, Ratzinger wasn't responsible for the parish assignments of priests, even those with a history of abusing children.

In the interview, the Pope says something that seems tangentially relevant. "It is never permissible... to steal away and to wish not to have seen it and to let the perpetrator continue working. It is therefore necessary for the Church to be vigilant, to punish those who have sinned, and above all to exclude them from further access to children." But it is curious that the text of the interview does not address the Hullermann incident explicitly. Seewald has not responded to a TIME query about whether the Hullermann case came up during his conversation with Benedict XVI.

Seewald broaches the idea of resigning, which many of the Pope's critics called for when revelations about the abuse crisis peaked in April. Benedict was adamant in response: "When the danger is great one must not run away." But the 83-year old pontiff did say that, contrary to perceived papal tradition, Popes should be able to consider resignation. "If a Pope clearly realizes that he is no longer physically, psychologically, and spiritually capable of handling the duties of of his office, then he has a right and, under some circumstances, also an obligation to resign." Early on in the text, Benedict, who admits he does not get on an exercise bike set up for him, tells Seewald that "I also notice my forces are diminishing."

Early on in the interview, Seewald calls Benedict "the most powerful Pope of all time" because of the Church's burgeoning army of believers the world over. But Benedict dials it down. "Among those 1.2 billion Catholics are many who inwardly are not there," he said. "Stalin was right in saying that the Pope has no divisions and cannot issue commands. Nor does he have a big business in which all the faithful of the Church are his employees or his subordinates... In that respect, the Pope... is a completely powerless man.

Why Sunday morning remains America's most segregated hour

Via:CNN

 

“Sunday morning is the most segregated hour of Christian America.”

That declaration, which has been attributed to Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., used to startle listeners. Now it’s virtually become a cliché. For years, various academic studies and news articles have reported what many churchgoers already know: most American congregations are segregated.

In the latest issue of the academic journal Sociological Inquiry, two professors dug deeper into why Sundays remain so segregated.

 The article, “Race, Diversity, and Membership Duration in Religious Congregations,’ said that nine out of ten congregations in the U.S. are segregated - a single racial groups accounts for more than 80 percent of their membership.

Kevin Dougherty , a sociology professor at Baylor University in Texas, and a co-author of the article, says churches haven't kept pace with other institutions.

Socially, we’ve become much more integrated in schools, the military and businesses. But in the places where we worship, segregation still seems to be the norm.

Attracting members of another race isn’t good enough, Dougherty says. Most congregations that draw racial minorities can’t keep them.

It’s not just an issue of attraction, of getting them into the door, but of retention.  Can we keep them? Our research indicates that we’ve not been able to.

Calling a church segregated may make some people uncomfortable because it implies that its members are racist. But many contemporary churches that are dominated by one racial group weren’t formed by racial animosity, Dougherty says.

Parishioners’ prefer to go to church with people who look like them, Dougherty says.

People choose churches where they feel comfortable. Maybe they get challenges there, but they’re going for the comfort.”

The first Christian church was known for its diversity. Jews, Gentiles, and Greeks mingled alongside women and slaves. Biblical scholars have long maintained that the early church’s diversity was one of the reasons it became so popular. Roman society was characterized by rigid ethnic and class divisions.

That was then, though.

How important is it for the  church to strive for that kind of ethnic diversity today - particularly since it seems many people don’t want it, according to the article?

Can American churches remain separate but equal?

Uniting Against the Quran-Burning Threat

Even in these fractious times, pundits and pols of all stripes condemn the stunt.

Who would have thought that it would be the threat of burning Qurans that would persuade pols and pundits of all stripes to show a little unity? That’s exactly what's been happening this week, and we have Pastor Terry Jones and his flock in Gainesville, Fla.—they of the “International Burn a Koran Day” (scheduled for the ninth anniversary of 9/11 this weekend)—to thank. 

As Jones’s planned stunt has garnered more publicity, a remarkable array of public figures has condemned it. Many, including Sen. John McCain, have noted the practical danger it poses to Americans: as Gen. David Petraeus said earlier this week, extremists across the globe would “undoubtedly” use images of the event as a recruiting tool and perhaps respond with violence. President Obama likened the impact of Jones’s proposed desecration to a “recruitment bonanza for Al Qaeda.”

 

Yet what stands out in this news cycle is not the practical argument against what might happen in Florida this weekend.  It’s the “values” argument—those intangible issues on which, as the Quran-burning discourse proves, Americans have more in common than we think. “What [Jones] is proposing to do is completely contrary to the value of Americans,” the president said. Added Mitt Romney, a 2012 Republican presidential candidate-in-waiting, “It violates a founding principle of our republic.” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said: “It is unfortunate. It is not who we are.”  Sarah Palin responded in a similar vein, writing, “Book burning is antithetical to American ideals.”

The list goes on and includes opposition from Fox News host Glenn Beck, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and another potential GOP presidential candidate, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour.

Conspicuously silent as of Thursday morning was Newt Gingrich, the Republican former speaker of the House, whose use of the term “stealth jihad” echoes the same fear of an undetected, international Muslim conspiracy that Jones expressed in an interview Thursday. Jones said he and his followers were burning the Muslim holy books to send a message to radical Islamists that “we do not want them to do what they appear to be doing in Europe,” namely, to “push their agenda” and impose Islamic law.

As NEWSWEEK’s Christopher Dickey notes in a column published Thursday, the idea of an international Muslim conspiracy is as misleading as it is helpful to Al Qaeda and other smaller groups of extremist Muslims who want to see their enemies crippled by fear. At least on this issue, our leaders appear to be wise to the propaganda game.

God did not create the universe, says Hawking

God did not create Universe: Hawking

God did not create the universe and the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics, the eminent British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking argues in a new book.

In "The Grand Design," co-authored with U.S. physicist Leonard Mlodinow, Hawking says a new series of theories made a creator of the universe redundant, according to the Times newspaper which published extracts on Thursday.

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist," Hawking writes.

"It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."

Hawking, 68, who won global recognition with his 1988 book "A Brief History of Time," an account of the origins of the universe, is renowned for his work on black holes, cosmology and quantum gravity.

Since 1974, the scientist has worked on marrying the two cornerstones of modern physics -- Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, which concerns gravity and large-scale phenomena, and quantum theory, which covers subatomic particles.

His latest comments suggest he has broken away from previous views he has expressed on religion. Previously, he wrote that the laws of physics meant it was simply not necessary to believe that God had intervened in the Big Bang.

He wrote in A Brief History ... "If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason -- for then we should know the mind of God."

In his latest book, he said the 1992 discovery of a planet orbiting another star other than the Sun helped deconstruct the view of the father of physics Isaac Newton that the universe could not have arisen out of chaos but was created by God.

"That makes the coincidences of our planetary conditions -- the single Sun, the lucky combination of Earth-Sun distance and solar mass, far less remarkable, and far less compelling evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us human beings," he writes.

Hawking, who is only able to speak through a computer-generated voice synthesizer, has a neuro muscular dystrophy that has progressed over the years and left him almost completely paralyzed.

He began suffering the disease in his early 20s but went on to establish himself as one of the world's leading scientific authorities, and has also made guest appearances in "Star Trek" and the cartoons "Futurama" and "The Simpsons."

Last year he announced he was stepping down as Cambridge University's Lucasian Professor of Mathematics, a position once held by Newton and one he had held since 1979.

"The Grand Design" is due to go on sale next week.

Ground Zero and the Freedom of Religion

800px-fema_-_4235_-_photograph_by_andrea_booher_taken_on_09-28-2001_in_new_york2

The controversy over the so-called “Ground Zero mosque” comes down to one
thing: no one should be denied the right to build a house of worship
solely on the basis of their religion. Blocking construction of a mosque
there would go against the principles of religious tolerance on which
this country is founded.

In a letter to the New York Times, the parents of several of the victims of the
attacks wrote that the Cordoba House project “has the trappings of a
victory mosque, given its location and talk about dedicating it on the
10th anniversary of the crime.” Some have questioned where the money to
build the mosque came from, vaguely insinuating—without any
evidence—that it must be from the same people who financed the September
11 attacks.

And Newt Gingrich argued that we shouldn’t allow any mosques near Ground Zero as long as there
are no churches in Saudi Arabia. Gingrich also claimed the name of the
center was “deliberately insulting” on the grounds that Cordoba—the
capital of the Islamic caliphate that ruled Spain some time after the
defeat of the Christian Visigoths—“is a symbol of Islamic conquest.”

But Gingrich has his history wrong.If Cordoba is famous for anything it is for being a place of religious
tolerance, where Muslims, Christians and Jews lived together for
centuries in relative harmony. It's this spirit of religious
understanding that the
Cordoba Initiative, whose mission is to “cultivate multi-faith and multi-cultural
understanding across minds and borders,” explicitly tries to invoke.
Saudi Arabia’s intolerance of Christians is certainly no reason to be
equally intolerant of American Muslims who do not make Saudi laws. And
far from celebrating the terrorist attacks, the Islamic community center
is meant to represent the other, more peaceful side of Islam, and show
that many Muslims stand with Americans of other faiths to condemn the
attacks.

Nevertheless, Sarah Palin called the proposed Cordoba House Islamic community center, which would
include a mosque, “an unnecessary provocation.” Minnesota Governor Tim
Pawlenty—who like Palin and Gingrich may be a presidential candidate in
2012—
says he strongly opposes putting a mosque anywhere near Ground Zero, on the
grounds that we shouldn’t allow any activities that would “degrade or
disrespect” what has become hallowed ground. Governor Pawlenty’s
spokesman
clarified the Governor’s remarks by saying that New York is a big place and that they should find a different location for the mosque.

Just how is the mosque a provocation, and just how does it disrespect the
victims of the the attacks on the World Trade Center? As Andrew Sullivan
writes,the clear implication of is “that American Muslims bear some collective
responsibility for the mass murder on 9/11—that there is no essential
difference between American Muslims eager for interfaith dialogue and
the mass murderers of 9/11.” But while the people who attacked the World
Trade Center were Muslims who justified their crime on religious
grounds, as I’ve
argued before, we shouldn’t confuse a group of radical jihadists with Muslims as a whole. And, as I’ve written,
their views are hardly the views of all Muslims. In fact, the dominant
theological tradition in Islam strongly condemns attacks on civilians.
Moreover, some of the victims of the attacks on the World Trade Center
were Muslim Americans. Muslims are certainly not all to blame for the
actions of a handful of fanatics who acted in the name of their
religion.

It certainly may be that building an Islamic community center near Ground
Zero is the wrong way to promote religious understanding in America.
Polls show that the most New Yorkers and most Americans don’t like the
idea. But blocking the construction of the community center to spare the
feelings of people who hold Muslims in general responsible for the
September 11 attacks would be like not allowing minorities to move into
white neighborhoods on the grounds that it makes some white residents
uncomfortable. Ultimately, as New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg
said,

Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the
heat of the debate has been a basic question—should government attempt
to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on
private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in
other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here. This
nation was founded on the principle that the government must never
choose between religions, or favor one over another.

And, as Andrew Sullivan asks at the end of his article,
if Muslims aren’t welcome to practice their religion near Ground Zero,
where does it end? Will we decide they aren’t welcome at Ground Zero at
all? Will they still even be welcome in America?

Sex Scandal Is Church's Main Threat

Pope

The clerical abuse scandal represents the greatest threat to the Roman Catholic Church and the crisis was "born from sins within the church" not outside, Pope Benedict XVI said Tuesday on a trip to Portugal.

He called for profound purification and penance within the church as well as pardon and justice.

In some of his strongest comments to date, Benedict said the Catholic church had always suffered from internal problems but that "today we see it in a truly terrifying way."

"The greatest persecution of the church doesn't come from enemies on the outside but is born from the sin within the church," the pontiff said. "The church needs to profoundly relearn penitence, accept purification, learn forgiveness but also justice."

Benedict was responding to journalists' questions, submitted in advance, aboard the papal plane while en route to Portugal, where he began a four-day visit Tuesday.

His comments appeared to repudiate the Vatican's initial response to the scandal, in which it blamed the media as well as pro-choice and pro-gay marriage advocates for mounting a campaign against the church and the pope in particular.

Since then, however, Benedict has called for penance and promised the church would take action to protect children and make abusive priests face justice.

As far as the church's purification is concerned, Benedict has already been cleaning house, accepting the resignations of a few bishops in recent weeks who either admitted they sexually abused youngsters or covered up for priests who did.

Just last week, the pope took control of the conservative Legionaries of Christ order after it was discredited by revelations that its founder fathered at least one child and sexually abused young seminarians.

More bishop resignations have been tendered and the Vatican official in charge of handling sex abuse cases has said he would not be surprised if the pope asks for more.

While the abuse scandal greatly overshadowed the pope's press conference, Portugal has not experienced the wave of priest abuse claims that have emerged in other European countries, including the pontiff's native Germany, as well as Austria, Belgium and Ireland among others.

Portugal, however, is undergoing the same problems that other European nations are experiencing in terms of a financial crisis.

Portugal's economic growth has been pedestrian for years, averaging less than 1% between 2001-2008, and the global downturn brought a steep contraction of 2.7% last year. A three-year austerity plan to ease the country's crippling debt load is expected to bring greater hardship to a people already feeling the pinch.

The pope said the fiscal crisis demonstrated the need for "moral responsibility" in the economics sphere and noted that he outlined his vision for a more ethical financial system in his 2009 encyclical "Charity in Truth."

Posterous theme by Cory Watilo